Euthanasia Essay - Mercy Killing Not Necessary :: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide

Euthanasia Essay - Mercy Killing Not Necessary Mercy Killing as Euthanasia is also known, has been bring outlawed within the United States. The definition of mercy killing is where someone is terminally ill with a disease, and an accomplice helps to end the misery of that victims life. In my opinion, this decision should be a live and let live decision. If and besides if the victim agrees ahead of time before the pain starts to end it, then they should live their life the way they inadequacy to if that includes ending it the way they want to, so be it. Atop this highly controversial topic are many illnesses which have led to the popularity of Euthanasia. Among those are Cancer, Aids, and Alzheimers. on that point is a very slim need for the use of Euthanasia today in my opinion.Supporters to full-fledged euthanasia often point out that they are carrying out the last wishes of the damned. One doc has said that Our ability to end pain is more powerful than at any time in t he history of adult male experience (Hanson). The key word of Euthanasia is intentional, if death is not intended it is not an act of Euthanasia. The debate rages today about this very controversial idea. Doctors grave of ethics will not allow this practice in general, yet it still remains such a hot topic which no doctor is able to set this conflict aside. By withdrawing treatment that would not provide a benefit to the patient, or withdrawing treatment that has shown to be ineffective, too burdensome, or is unwanted, and handsome the high doses of pain killers, that may endanger life when they have shown to be necessary are all part of good medical practice, but only when they are properly carried out. The concept of human rights were derived from considerations of the nature of mankind, originated when a political context. Natural Rights, as they are called, were developed as a proclamation of indecorum to be used to guarantee freedom from attack on ones life, dignity, o r property. There were considered to apply equally to each individual, or to equivalent groups, there were unconditioned and imposed on others a duty to respect them. These natural rights were also joined by welfare rights, even though grounded in nature and reason, these are not universally applicable and many would be thought absurd or unattainable in many cultures.